About us Contact us Site map
Search:
Download Backgammon
Backgammon Home
Backgammon Download
Backgammon Blog
Backgammon Rules
Beginners Guide
Online Backgammon
Sites Reviews
Tournaments
Backgammon Tips
Backgammon Articles
Position Analysis
Backgammon News
Backgammon Facts
Backgammon Glossary
Backgammon Resources
Site Map
Online Backgammon Federation|Backgammon Blog|Backgammon and the Philosophy of Games Classifying

Backgammon and the Philosophy of Games Classifying

There are several ways to classify games - by their nature (skill or chance), their equipment (cards or pen and paper), the number of players (solitaire vs. massively multi players), etc – and then there are dozens of possible combinations (like skill one-player online card games) and sub categories (multi-player construction and management simulations video games).

Corvus suggests another way to categorize games: immersion vs. engaging games. While, according to his suggestion, every engaging game is also immersive, this does not necessarily match the other way around. i.e., every game (he talks of video games, but feel free to broaden the definition to any game of your choice, including backgammon obviously) that can attract and hold the attention of a player is essentially a game capable of absorbing the player. Yet, some games stay there, immersive but unable to drown the player's totally.
backgammon
Backgammon, the art director did not work extra hours

Talking about video games, the 3D life-like graphics is a major factor in making the difference between immersive and engaging game, so does the game play and its plot. But what about simpler games? Is backgammon an engaging game, an immersive one or neither? Some of the people who commented to this post have already answered to these questions. First comment was made by someone who, as a non fan of backgammon, grew up amazed of the game's taking over of his father's attention, who "used to play backgammon in coffeehouses and he wouldn’t even recognize me even after half an hour of my arrival".

And second, by another one who wonders whether the division between immersive and engaging games is not parallel to the separation between right and left brain, thus, backgammon, chess and other games where the art director did not work extra hours, employ the left, more verbal, mathematical, and logical side of the brain. What means that despite the original thesis, backgammon is an engaging, yet not immersive game, or have I got it all mixed up?


Add to: Del.icio.us  Add to: Digg  Add to: StumbleUpon   Add to: Reddit   Add to: Slashdot   Add to: Technorati   Add to: Netscape   Add to: Newsvine   Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Spurl Add to: Google Add to: Blinklist Add to: Blinkbits Add to: Ma.Gnolia